Death penalty not sought as Headley cooperated: US
By IANS - NEW DELHI
25th January 2013 08:13 PM
-
Pakistani American Headley, who played a key role in the 2008 attack, received a 35-year jail term Thursday. (AP/File)
The US Friday said its justice department decided against seeking death for David Headley because he cooperated with law enforcement authorities over the 26/11 Mumbai attack.
Pakistani American Headley, who played a key role in the 2008 attack, received a 35-year jail term Thursday.
Referring to the sentence without parole of Headley, a US embassy statement said: "It reflects both severe punishment for Headley's role in the heinous 26/11 crimes and a decision by the US Department of Justice not to seek the death penalty.
"This decision was taken because of Headley's willingness to cooperate with law enforcement authorities -- American, Indian and others -- to help bring the perpetrators to justice and prevent other terrorist attacks."
It said Headley provided information that was of substantial value "in our efforts to combat international terrorism and to save lives".
Citing instances, it said Headley testified against a co-conspirator, Tahawwur Rana, who is serving a 14-year sentence.
"Headley provided extensive detail about accused terrorist leader Ilyas Kashmiri and his network. Ilyas Kashmiri was indicted in 2009.
"Headley answered questions from Indian law enforcement.
"Headley assisted US investigators in bringing criminal charges against five other terrorists," the statement said.
It said Headley provided US law enforcement authorities with extensive detail about the structure, personnel, methods, abilities and plans of terrorist group Lashkar-e-Taeba.
Stressing that the counter-terrorism cooperation between India and the US was "stronger than ever", it said the FBI had provided its expertise and testified in the Indian prosecution of Mumbai accused Ajmal Kasab.
It added that Headley's sentence marked another step in its efforts to bring to justice those responsible for the Mumbai attack.
"We are working together to see that those responsible for 26/11 and other acts of terrorism are brought to justice, wherever they may be," it said.
Post a Comment
Recent Activity
- For team Rahul, it’s good politics that will yield rich dividends for poor Indians
- Four years of UPA-II
- Nine years as PM: What will be Manmohan Singh's legacy?
- Maharashtra’s aid to digitise rare manuscripts in Thanjavur
- 'Climate change may spell disaster for coastal economy'
- Lanka’s woman Thavil players fading away
- Pakistan's answer to electricity shortages: Don't wear socks
- All dead, no vultures fly in Andhra now!
- BSNL Ernakulam posts Rs 390-crore turnover
- CM can go his way: Ramesh Chennithala
- Chennai Super Kings beat Mumbai Indians, reach IPL finals
- Incredible India! Cuppa at Rs 1,200 is Chiru’s idea of sustainable tourism
- Names of UPA ministers will surface in IPL spot-fixing: Swamy
- Suriya storms ahead of Vijay, Ajith online
- Yasin Malik’s support for Sri Lanka Tamils a sham
- Knowledge and faith
Comments(1)
For those within the policy making establishment who want to blindly buy defence equipment from the US , take a look at their U turn with the Dick Headley caseTO REALISE HOW UNRELIABLE THE US IS!! How can we depend on such a partner to supply us with spare parts for our defence equipment when we need it most No doubt US companies aggressively (through bribery) are trying to take the lions share of the Indian defence equipment, trying to push out competitors like France , Israel. The UK and Russia.They are likely to be unsuccessful in their endevours. The point is if they make a U turn on their promises(defence deals) , it is India which will be left in the dry Hence transfer of technology and the right to produce the equipment is a must in all agreements with this unreliable US We are better off buying from traditional allies who are time tested
Posted by Raj at 01/26/2013 12:10 Reply to this Report abuse