Wives may no longer be free cooks

08th September 2012 08:19 AM

Are you a homemaker fretting that your bank account does not get replenished at the first of every month?

Fret no more, for if the proposal mooted by the Union Women and Child Development Ministry is implemented, your husband could soon be legally mandated to pay you a fixed monthly sal-ary for doing daily household chores.

The Ministry is preparing a draft Bill that would entitle housewives a monthly income from their husbands.

The Bill is likely to be presented before Parliament within six months.

Union Minister for Women and Child Development Krishna Tirath said the proposal was aimed at empowering women.

“A majority of women in India are involved in household chores after getting married but they do not get any salary for it. The socially accepted behaviour becomes a tragedy when a woman gets divorced or is widowed when she is left with nothing for survival. The Government is mulling to bring a law under which a husband will have to legally pay a definite amount to his wife from his salary and the Ministry has started preparing a draft in this regard,” Tirath told Express during a telephonic interview from New Delhi on Friday.

“When we are given an equal status by the Constitution, why is it that we have to accept the social condition that takes it for granted that women have to do the household chores? She is no slave and now we have to fight to bring about a change in thinking,” she added.

Since an estimated two-thirds of married Indian women are victims of domestic violence, Tirath believed this economic empowerment would be a welcome respite for them.

She also favoured for exempting this income from the tax net saying, “The income of the domestic help or cook is not taxed.

“When the housewife is performing all those chores and much more efficiently, why should her income be taxed?”

A section of housewives in Coimbatore welcomed the proposal.

“The proposal would benefit all women who let go of their jobs to run the household after marriage. Further, the twaddle that we are subjected to is essentially because the man realises that we are financially dependent,” says Geetha Sankar.

“Considering the number of roles a woman plays in the family I doubt if the husband would be left with anything if he had to pay for all her services.

“Being a housewife is almost like playing multitude roles in a corporate house as one has to juggle between being a peon by running to fetch things for husband and kids, a cleaner cleaning up after their mess, a secretary reminding them of their meetings and homework and the most daunting task of managing the accounts in the measly part of the salary that the husband gives. We should even be entitled to an annual increment,” argues Kavitha Srikanth, another homemaker.

A+ A A-

Comments(4)

What I understand is that if the employer is not allowed to fire an employee, the system does not work. The employer must be free to fire his employee and recruit new ones.

When a government gets too much money as taxes and only a small portion is spent on infrastructural development projects, it will have bureaucrats who will come up with such harebrained ideas. India is a diverse society with a variety of relationships between married couples. In a marriage, a wife (as well as a husband) is expected to do certain tasks. Payment for some tasks are considered immoral. Payment implies an employer employee or contractual relationship. A marriage is more sacred than that. Now that the Union Women and Child Development Ministry is engaged in this task, (rather than rural sanitation, water supply, etc.,) I suggest that they try to develop training material for families on how to develop good relationships, a feasible family budget, and such.

It is a great idea to do this. Women who go through verbal abuse of eating up the husband's income, while SIMPLY SITTING AT HOME, as usually refereed to,is the most humiliating comment. it kills the self respect of a women, while her work is totally nullified. This will bring about a great change in the Society. But, the question is, how will the value of her work measured?

If the rules are made in lines of an employee-employer contract, the men will benefit financially from this law, though the social implications will be devastating and our pride in Indian family and stability of marriage will bite the dust. Think about it- if a man pays for his wife's services, he will no longer need to pay for other stuff like clothes, cosmetics, outings or vacations. Since the wife is sharing the roof, she will have to pay rent and share the cost of living. The cost of keeping a maid will be borne out of the wife's salary if she wants to keep a help as household chores are her responsibility now. Not sure how medical bills or in-laws expenses will be managed. As in every employee-employer relationship, performance reviews should be critical, or else the home will become a govt office since the wife will know that no matter what she does, she will never be fired. I think this is a win for husbands (in a weird way) who hate to take take their wives shopping.

Post a Comment
*
1000 characters left

All comments will be reactively moderated

Disclaimer: The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. Comments are automatically posted live; however, newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

Recent Activity

What's Hot?