Kerala stakes claim for 500 MW from Koodankulam Plant
By Cithara Paul | ENS - NEW DELHI
08th August 2012 08:25 AM
Taking the tussle between Tamil Nadu and Kerala over Koodankulam Atomic ower Plant project to the next level, Chief Minister Oommen Chandy has met Union Power Minister Veerappa Moily to demand an increased share from the project for Kerala.
Citing that Kerala is going through a severe power crisis due to the weak South-West monsoon, Chandy has requested the Power Minister to raise the state’s allocation of power to at least 500 MW instead of the expected 266 MW as per the Gadgil formula.
Oommen Chandy and his team of ministers are in the capital on a two-day visit.
According to Chandy, Moily agreed to examine the requests and “assured to do the needful within the overall frame-work.”
Chandy’s meeting with Moily is in the backdrop of Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa’s letter to the Prime Minister staking claim for the entire power produced at Kudankulam.
Oommen Chandy has now written to Manmohan Singh demanding 500 MW for Kerala from the project.
Chandy had also written a letter raising the same issues earlier.
The Kudankulam nuclear plant is expected to generate 2000 MW of power. The first unit is expected to be commissioned next month and the second unit is expected to start generating power a few months after the first unit. As per the Gadgil formula, Tamil Nadu should get 925 MW power from the two 1000 MW units and Kerala is eligible for 266 MW power. But now, Chandy has asked for 500 MW power citing the prevailing power shortage in the state.
He has reportedly said that Kerala faces the same threat potential that Tamil Nadu faces from the Kudankulam plant in case of a disaster.
It may be recalled that Aruna Roy, a member of the NAC, the UPA think tank headed by Congress president Sonia Gandhi, had urged Kerala to up its ante against the plant as it could be equally harmful to the state.
She had said that Thiruvananthapuram will be the first major city to be affected in case of an accident.
“In addition, as Tamil Nadu meets a significant part of Kerala’s food requirements, ranging from vegetables, milk, poultry and meat, Kerala should be careful about the routine radiation risks of food items from the Kudankulam impacted area,” she added.
After giving the green signal to the Kudankulam nuclear power plant which remained stalled for several months following a protest by anti-nuclear activists, Jayalalithaa had demanded that the entire 2000 MW power to be generated by its two units be given to Tamil Nadu in view of the severe power shortage.
In the letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, she had said that it would be ‘proper and justifiable if the entire power to be generated from the Kudankulam Plant is provided to Tamil Nadu.’
According to Kerala, Tamil Nadu is eligible only for 925 MW of the total power generated by the plant. Stating that KKNPP is a Central power generating station, Kerala argued that Tamil Nadu has no right to claim the whole electricity generated at Kudankulam.
Post a Complaint
Recent Activity
- For team Rahul, it’s good politics that will yield rich dividends for poor Indians
- Four years of UPA-II
- Nine years as PM: What will be Manmohan Singh's legacy?
- Maharashtra’s aid to digitise rare manuscripts in Thanjavur
- 'Climate change may spell disaster for coastal economy'
- Lanka’s woman Thavil players fading away
- Pakistan's answer to electricity shortages: Don't wear socks
- All dead, no vultures fly in Andhra now!
- Incredible India! Cuppa at Rs 1,200 is Chiru’s idea of sustainable tourism
- Suriya storms ahead of Vijay, Ajith online
- BSNL Ernakulam posts Rs 390-crore turnover
- Chennai Super Kings beat Mumbai Indians, reach IPL finals
- Meghalaya's CMJ University faces probe after awarding suspicious PhDs
- CM can go his way: Ramesh Chennithala
- Yasin Malik’s support for Sri Lanka Tamils a sham
- Vindu Dara Singh nabbed for IPL scam links
Comments(3)
Quoting from the article...." It may be recalled that Aruna Roy, a member of the NAC, the UPA think tank headed by Congress president Sonia Gandhi, had urged Kerala to up its ante against the plant as it could be equally harmful to the state." I have a question on this. If the plant could harm Kerala, is that why Kerala did not want the Plant on its soil earlier on? But now, since you have No Power, you want the 500 MW Power from KNPP. Isnt that opportunism & selfishness on Kerala's part?
Posted by Venkat at 08/08/2012 10:39 Reply to this Report abuse
There is no satisfactory solution for rationally sharing the 2000 MW to be generated from this Koodankulam power plant; 50% or 1000 MW or max. 1250 MW could be given to Tamil Nadu. The sharing pattern for remainder quantum between difft.demanding and power deficit states need to be hammered out. After all ,the state govt. has had to handle so many massive public admin. and law and order situations already in various ways. How natural gas companies miserably fail to perform and deliver in spite of very specific very explicit very costly signed contracts and how they let down badly the gasbased power plants, how immense power supply hardships could be to millions of people, has been learnt the very hard way in Andhra Pradesh for some months now, ; so much so that PM's intervention and debottleneckings had to be sought. It appears for the Kudankulam plant also, PM's intervention may be necessary at the initial stage itself..PM is now the umpire , the judge for so many disputes.
Posted by Observer at 08/08/2012 13:31 Reply to this Report abuse
Kerala badly wants power but chose not to have nuclear plant on its soil for known reasons. Now the situation seems worse that nuclear plant is "cleverly" built on the border of Kerala. All power demanded by Tamilnadu, fully aware their major cities are far away & safe whereas Kerala is made to bear the major brunt with its major cities within the radius and no/less power from this plant. Considering the risk factor, Kerala should be given 1500MW of Kudankulam power and Tamilnadu remaining 500MW power.
Posted by oneindia at 08/08/2012 18:25 Reply to this Report abuse