Dinesh Reddy’s appointment as DGP quashed
By Express News Service - HYDERABAD
17th August 2012 08:11 AM
-
The High Court wanted the new appointment made within four weeks. Till then, Dinesh Reddy will officiate as DGP without the perks and allowances payable to the head of the police force. | EPS
In a setback to the state government, the High Court on Thursday struck down the appointment of V Dinesh Reddy as the director-general of police (head of the police force).
Upholding the verdict of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) that had previously found fault with the appointment, a division bench of the court directed the state government to appoint a new man to the post after following the due procedure: sending names of the senior-most IPS officers to the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC).
Judges G Raghuram and M S Ramachandra Rao also slapped a fine of Rs 5,000 on the state government for appealing against the CAT order.
The High Court wanted the new appointment made within four weeks. Till then, Dinesh Reddy will officiate as DGP without the perks and allowances payable to the head of the police force.
The verdict triggered speculation that the state government would go in for appeal in the Supreme Court. But the view in the government is that Dinesh Reddy’s position may not change even if the due procedure suggested by High Court is followed.
As things stand, Dinesh Reddy happens to be the senior-most IPS officer in the state, with officers senior to him having been removed from the picture for various reasons in the last few months. Umesh Kumar, senior to Dinesh from the 1977 batch, is currently under suspension while Gautam Kumar of the 1975 batch has already opted for voluntary retirement, which was accepted. Another senior officer, A Sivasankar also of the 1977 batch, retired recently.
However, if the Supreme Court’s directions in the Prakash Singh case -- a minimum tenure of two years for DGP -- were to be followed, there is a possiblity of an DG-rank officer junior to Dinesh Reddy being appointed as the state police chief.
If three names are indeed sent to the UPSC, the officers so shortlisted -- apart from Dinesh Reddy himself -- may be from among T P Das, Aruna Bahuguna, B Prasada Rao and S A Huda -- all of the 1979 batch. Another officer of that batch, Ashok Prasad has already been appointed as DGP of Jammu & Kashmir.
Caustic in its comments, the bench was of the view that the state consciously and consistently disregarded the unambigious directive of the Supreme court delivered in the Prakash Singh vs Union of India case on appointments of DGPs.
Related Articles
Post a Comment
Recent Activity
- For team Rahul, it’s good politics that will yield rich dividends for poor Indians
- BJP's post-Karnataka gloom: Neither united nor untainted
- Hit by chit fund scam Mamata faces biggest challenge in 2 years
- 'Kiran visited Delhi 76 times since he became CM'
- Bangalore scores low on medical tourism
- Sleepless nights, no baths for Sreesanth
- ‘Lack of anthropologists hits welfare policymaking’
- India's bleeding insurgencies: Lessons from Latin America
- Key relationships
- Rs 8K-crore plan for upgrading ICVs of Army
- Car makers run into diesel dilemma
- Man arrested for attempt to attack TV host Ranjini Haridas
- NEET 2013: CBSE gaffe leaves students in a fix
- Jiju Janardhanan’s house in Kannur wears deserted look
- Hope floats for Nokia
- Sleepless nights, no baths for Sreesanth
Comments(2)
One needs to read the judgment to really understand the complete story (available on AP High Court site (WP no. 19026 of 2012)). The judgement clearly mentions how the in house selection panel chose the name of 5 eligible officers (excluding Balwinder Singh due to his short length of service remaining). However, the CM KK Reddy showed his bias and favoritism by select the "junior most" Dinesh Reddy from the list: Eventually, following a Curzonesque but speedier process, the issue reached the Hon ble Chief Minister, who having perceived "the best track record and commendable performance in various posts held", by the fifth (and junior-most) officer, ordered his appointment as DGP (HoPF). The four senior-most officers, found fit by the screening/selection committee however failed to measure up to the exacting standards, for appointment as DGP (HoPF).
Posted by R Dayal at 08/17/2012 12:09 Reply to this Report abuse
It is time such appointments be made by an independent body duly constituted by a committee of Ministers, Opposition leaders of impeccable records of public service and perhaps Chairman of PSC on objective criteria
Posted by PBalachandran at 08/18/2012 09:26 Reply to this Report abuse