Government allows prosecution of Telangana advocates
By Express News Service - HYDERABAD
16th December 2012 09:25 AM
The government on Saturday gave permission to the city police to prosecute 24 advocates in connection with the cases related to unauthorised assembly, criminal intimidation and damage to pubic property in the High Court premises in 2010.
The advocates, under the banner of Telangana Advocates Joint Action Committee (TAJAC), had stalled the High Court for several days with protests, which had turned violent at times. Amid the heightened agitation for separate Telangana that year, they were demanding that advocates from the region get their share in the appointment to law officer posts.
The Charminar police had initially registered cases but they were later transferred to the Central Crime Station. The Supreme Court later took serious note of the incidents and questioned the government about the action taken against the advocates.
Police registered the cases against the accused under various sections of the IPC. But with some specific sections needing the government’s permission, the police wrote to the government, following which the law department on Saturday issued a GO according permission to the police to go ahead with the prosecution.
Police had investigated the cases with the help of available video footage and registered cases against the advocates under sections including 147, 506, 323, 186, 228 and 153-A read with section 149 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property (PDPP) Act.
The accused no 1 in the case is a woman advocate from Dilsukhnagar, Bagyamma Marrireddy, who is a practitioner in the High Court.
The other accused are Manjula Vakeel of Karmanghat, Venkat Yadav Chalakani of RK Puram, Akula Bikshapathi (an ex-sarpanch of Chintulla in Yacharam), G Viplan Yadav of Barkatpura, J Sampath Kumar of Vidyanagar, G Chandrasekhar Reddy of Malakpet, P Krishna Reddy of Ramanthapur, R Raghamma of Nallakunta (all High Court advocates), Butchi Reddy of Vikarabad, N Srinivas Yadav of Vittalwadi, G Rajavardhan Reddy of Namalgundu, Sampoorna Devi of Chikkadpally, G Venkatesh of Amberpet, Manik Prabhu of Lal Darwaza and Manik Reddy of Esamia Bazar (all advocates of Metropolitan criminal court).
Other city civil court advocates in the case are P Ashok of Chilkalguda, Santosh Singh of Himayathnagar, Shashank Goel of Kacheguda, J Chandraiah Yadaiah, etc. The advocates were shown as ‘absconding’ in the order.
- Not a drop of Cauvery for people on its banks
- Dalit discrimination 'forms' in colleges
- Marine turtles giving Kerala a miss
- New mango named Nirbhaya after gang-rape victim
- Shortage of essential TB drug heightens risk to patients, others
- Four years of UPA-II
- Nine years as PM: What will be Manmohan Singh's legacy?
- Maharashtra’s aid to digitise rare manuscripts in Thanjavur
- CM can go his way: Ramesh Chennithala
- Names of UPA ministers will surface in IPL spot-fixing: Swamy
- Knowledge and faith
- BrahMos missile test fired from Russian warship
- BSNL Ernakulam posts Rs 390-crore turnover
- IPL ban, takeover of BCCI sought
- Incredible India! Cuppa at Rs 1,200 is Chiru’s idea of sustainable tourism
- Spot-fixing: CSK owner's relative under police scanner for Vindu connection