Sharapova, SWilliams hit back on equal prize-money
By Steve Douglas | AP - WIMBLEDON
29th June 2012 11:29 AM
-
Two of the biggest stars of women's tennis didn't hold back Thursday when responding to comments made by 13th-ranked Gilles Simon that has rekindled the debate over equal prize money. (AP)
Maria Sharapova had a simple retort to the notion
that men should be paid more than women at Grand Slam tournaments. Serena
Williams just laughed and covered her face with one hand before delivering her
own riposte.
Two of the biggest stars of women's tennis didn't hold back Thursday when
responding to comments made this week by 13th-ranked Gilles Simon — a member of
the ATP Player Council — that has rekindled the debate over equal prize money
and made it a hot topic again at Wimbledon.
While Simon defended his viewpoint and said that a majority of male players
agree with him — but are afraid to speak out — Sharapova offered a clear answer
to why she deserves the money she earns.
"I'm sure there are a few more people that watch my matches than
his," she said.
Sharapova beat Tsvetana Pironkova in a tough three-set match on a packed Court
1 on Thursday to reach the third round at Wimbledon, while Simon lost in
straight sets to Xavier Malisse on Court 3.
On a more serious note, Sharapova added: "Look, we women have fought so
long to get equal prize money. It was a big challenge and nobody really
supported us. It's been a few years since we've gotten that. We're all really
proud of it, and we continue to build the sport and make it bigger."
Sharapova's comments were relayed to Williams after her match on Centre Court.
"You know I can't bite my tongue," Williams said. "Definitely a
lot more people are watching Maria than Simon. She's way hotter than he is.
Women's tennis, I think, is really awesome.
"It's a great fight. We fought for years with Billie Jean King, and Venus
(Williams) as well, really set the pattern on what we should do."
In 2007, Wimbledon became the last Grand Slam tournament to start giving equal
prize money to the men's and women's singles champions. The French Open
introduced it a year earlier, copying the U.S. Open and Australian Open who
have had it for years.
Simon, however, believes male players provide more entertainment during matches
and should be compensated accordingly.
Stridently defending his viewpoint Thursday, the Frenchman claimed
"everybody in the locker room" agreed with him.
"The 128 players (in the men's singles draw at Wimbledon) think just like
me, that's for sure. Just ask them," the Frenchman said. "Maybe they
can't say it. ... Maybe they will lose, I don't know, $2 million on the
contracts if they say that.
"My point of view was just about the entertainment. If you just watch how
it is working in every other sport, even for the singers, you're just paid by
the public directly. My point was that I have the feeling that men's tennis is
actually more interesting than women's tennis. As in any business or anything,
you just have to be paid just about that. It's not because we play five sets
and they are playing three."
Simon also noted that Wimbledon charges more for tickets to the men's singles
final than the women's. This year, for example, a seat at Centre Court for the
men's final costs 120 pounds ($185), while tickets are 105 (about $160) for the
women's.
In public, though, male players have been slow to back Simon.
Roger Federer avoided wading into the debate after his second-round win on
Wednesday.
Malisse said he shared Simon's view but "I'd rather not get into it. I'd
rather he gets into it."
Andy Roddick said the whole debate should not become "a gender issue"
and that tennis is a business like any other.
"I'm sure there's a way to figure out who people are coming to
watch," Roddick said. "I'm sure there's TV ratings to look at. I'm
sure there are ample numbers out there to dissect. As any business goes, you
look at those numbers and then decide where it goes from there."
Andy Murray said "there's a lot of things the guys do agree on," and
pointed out that it's easier for women to play both singles and doubles at the
Grand Slams because they play fewer sets.
"It's not always just about equal pay, it's about the way the men's and
women's tournaments differ," he said.
Simon faced a series of pointed questions from reporters after his loss, with
one asking whether he felt he had delivered an entertaining performance in
falling in straight sets.
"That doesn't change anything," Simon said. "My point of view
doesn't depend on my result."
He added that women should be entitled to more prize money than men if the
women's game becomes "more interesting" — and didn't argue against
Sharapova's point.
"Maria is more famous than me. I know it. She deserves to earn more money
than me," he said.
Post a Comment
Recent Activity
- You are aiming high, but beware of marketers selling you as an FMCG
- With Advani visit, Modi begins charm offensive
- Social media goes martial over High Court's marital ruling
- Slum removal scheme tweaked to make it more effective
- Ready to tune in the lord, catch him up on Twitter
- 95 per cent stolen goods not recovered in Kerala, says NCRB
- Karnataka MLAs were frugal in their poll spending
- Now talcum powder linked to ovarian cancer
- Indian Coast Guards help rescue 26 crew from shipwreck near Yemen
- Thousands missing near Kedarnath shrine
- Army Major captures 'UFO' in Kerala
- Callgate: Doctors were prime target for Biju, Saritha Nair
- Learnt to embrace simplicity from SRK: Puvisha
- Prices of 348 drugs to come down drastically from May 15
- Congress to vote in Nitish government's favour today
- Congress raking up secularism issue to hide its failures: BJP
Comments(1)
Equal money is okay if its 5 set match.
Posted by tennis fan at 07/01/2012 10:05 Reply to this Report abuse