Obama’s retail FDI self-goal

18th July 2012 12:02 AM

It is Hillary Clinton, US secretary of state now and Walmart director till 1992, who has been lobbying for foreign direct investment (FDI) in retail in India, the visa Walmart needs to enter India. Now it is the United States President Barack Obama himself. In the guise of urging a fresh wave of economic reforms, Obama has clearly asked India to invite Walmart. India is shocked at his ugly intrusion. The opposition is angry. The prime minister, as usual, is silent. The otherwise talkative India Inc too is quiet. “Obama is not properly briefed”, laments Veerappa Moily. Anand Sharma asserts, hesitatingly, India’s right to make policies. Some in the media — bit shamelessly — welcome Obama’s uncouth intrusion editorially and with editorialised headlines like ‘Policy paralysis in New Delhi reaches White House’. Actually, is not the otherway round? Is it not the White House that seeks to transfer its worries to New Delhi?

What drives the pressure on New Delhi for FDI in retail? Walmart lobbyists, Yes. However, the drive is deeper. Obama is desperate to lift the falling sentiments of US economy. The fundamentals of US and most European Union economies are weak with poor household, bank, government and national finances, all of them plagued by deficits and debts. That more and more paper money is being created and pumped in to keep households, banks and businesses solvent is now public fact. Some EU economies are actually bankrupt. On fundamentals, the US too would be, but for the US Dollar having unduly populated the world in its best times and co-opted the world to sink or sail with the US now. Obama and his advisers see no easy answer to such malaise built over three decades. The much touted US economic recovery since 2010, bargained at $6 trillion extra debt to US government since 2008, is turning into a mirage. From signs of fatigue in 2011 it is fear of downturn in 2012. In September 2011, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) downgraded the US economic growth from 2.5 per cent to 1.5 per cent and in 2012 from 2.8 per cent to 1.8 per cent. Recently, the Central Budget Office (CBO) US has predicted gloom for the US economy, with US deficit till 2019 projected at $9.5 trillion and the federal debt, $10 trillion in 2008 and $15.5 trillion in 2011, predicted to be $16.7 trillion by 2012. That is not all. US consumer debt is rising. Yet its consumption is falling from over 71 per cent in 2010 to less than 71 per cent in 2011. Household savings is down from over 8 per cent in May 2009 to 3.7 per cent in April 2012. The US needs more savings and more consumption together — like simultaneous summer and winter!

Understandably Obama looks for easy alternatives like fabricating sentiments to lift the markets. US economic thinkers, and their disciples world over, for instance, believe that if the emerging economies do well, US market sentiments and business confidence will rise. However, if China does well by more exports to US, that would actually do down the US. Again, if US consumers consume more, market sentiments and business confidence will rise, but that will dynamite household and the bank balance sheets even more. Yet, with the US now accustomed to living on the ventilator of market sentiments, not economic fundamentals, Obama believes that India opening its retail will lift market sentiments and business confidence in the US. He talks of additional jobs in US with Walmart in India. He is keen to show to American voters the FDI-in-retail trophy from India and promise more jobs to Americans. Not a single job may get added, but the sentiments will lift Dow Jones stock index, as Obama goes for polls. It is the presidential candidate Obama, more than President Obama, acting now.

Obama’s intrusion is not without background. Even before Obama visited India in end 2010, efforts were made to welcome him with an invite to Walmart. US government, US Inc and US media had been working ahead of his visit on the Indian government, India Inc and Indian media for an invite to Walmart. Before Obama, Mike Duke, Walmart CEO came to India, met all concerned and left, optimistic about a Walmart entry. India Inc and the Indian media began pushing Duke’s wish, shedding tears for the Indian farmer, for his plight at the hands of the Indian traders. However, time was too short for the final act. By July 2011, the lobbyists had perfected the records for the final act. On November 24, 2011, the prime minister announced a policy to allow 51 per cent FDI in Indian retail trade. The delight of US-Walmart was short-lived. The traders declared a strike. A united Opposition supported them. ‘No roll-back’ asserted the government. The fatal blow came from within the UPA. Mamata Banerjee got the PM’s decision put on hold, till consensus emerged among stakeholders. An accomplished success thus ended in utter humiliation. See how the powerful and multifaceted lobbies strike back.

First the rupee mysteriously nosedives from `48-49 to a dollar in end February to between `55-57 during May to July. The rupee’s fundamentals do not deserve that kind of fall, says the Reserve Bank of India. The three-month premia for future delivery of dollars rises suddenly from 6-7 per cent in December 2011 to almost 11 per cent in Feb-Mar 2012. This perhaps causes a huge rise in the purchase of dollar in the spot market, and forces the dollar to rise and the rupee to fall. This actually needs inquiry. The rupee’s fall puts pressure on the soft points of Indian economy — falling forex reserves and rising oil prices. Using the situation, lobbyists promptly start cry for economic reforms.

In India reform means only opening the economy to FDI, particularly in retail now. Media and business lobbyists clamour for Walmart to save the Indian farmers! There is all round fear that, citing the stress, the government would go for an all-out opening of the economy, not just retail. Obama’s intervention, however, has changed all that. He has made it impossible for the UPA government to invite Walmart now. If it opens the retail sector to FDI, it would be acquiescing to Obama. This needs a look at Indo-US history. For decades, the US was a suspect in the Indian mind. This long-held suspicion relates back to the Cold War days when the US promoted Pakistan and tormented India. Not much has changed despite the US being tortured by Pakistan now. Unaware of this sensitive history, Obama has blundered. His intrusion has raised questions over the motives of the US.

QED: Obama’s self-goal has torpedoed all possibilities of an Indian visa to Walmart in the near future.

S Gurumurthy is a well-known commentator on political and economic issues.

E-mail: comment@gurumurthy.net

A+ A A-

Comments(6)

In national interest this article must be translated into regional languages and widely circulated by the Indian Traders organizations, the probable first victim of Walmart entry.

We do not need any more mallls as all are failing and closing and reopening after reducing running overheads. Our Indian wall mart is crores of road side Vendors supplying all types of daily basic needs. Farmers are always sceptical about government policies and middlemen selling their produce and making more money than reasonable. Our crores+ Rickshaw pullers are transporting people and materials and saving costly Petrol and Diesel. So who is keeping India ALIVE, RICH or POOR. So stop chasing developed world except for knowledge, gain it to use and create your wealth, contain population, create infrastructure and work hard with honesty is the real need. We are a big country and stand on our own leg and like chinese. When they can do it why not we? Fact is we are better placed than china but burdened by poor will and the governance. So let us forget FDI in retail till we are ready with enough wealth and consumers on our own terams. This may take minmum 50 years with new Governance.

Such high pressure salesmanship has been going on for the last few years. America is behaving as if India is it colony and is dictating what eocnomic policy it should follow. Two years back, when the Indo-US Business Council met. US officials gave a list of items to our minsiter where they wanted liberalisation and also went to the undiplomatic and arrogant extent of telling our minister that they expected the decision of the Indian govt. before their President visited India! The Indian govt. did not protest at this. There is no surprise therefore that this trend is continuing even more virulently. Shocking but it is true, that India gave Dow Chemicals another gift in Pune of researching in poisonous gases (it was dropped because of farmers’ protest) and two years back, US had the temerity to ask India to abate the public outcry in India against Dow. Even then our governmetn was silent. Now they want us to open retail trade, etc. and are pronouncing verdict on our reforms process. T

This cannot be tolerated any more and public anger has grown. See the way govt’s top Law Officers quoted Obama statement yesterday in the Supreme Court in the 2G case as if it is a US supreme court verdict to buttress their claim. Such recourse to comments of foreign govt’s views are not made before our apex court; it is infra dig to so. UPA is slowly allowing our sovereignity to be diluted. Opening up retail trade to foreign interests will only serve western interest. A western study of lakhs of FDI projects in the 30 years 1970-2000 has classfied foreign invesmtent into good, bad and indifferent. Here in India we are prepared to lap up even Dow’s offer FDI to research of all things poisonous gases a feidl in which they failed in Bhopal miserably. Further arguments are superfluous.

I enjoyed that telling message, "It is like wanting summer and winter at the same time". Rarely such great words are come across! Message is simple and straight for anyone: 'Once you are into spending ways uncaring for tomorrow or saving for rainy day, no one will come forward to pull you from going down the drain to help you again live in your own rampant spend-spend life style'. This message is clear to everyone but not so to spendthrift Western world & Americans. When I searched for the meaning of REFORM in Dictionary, I found following : '' Amend what is defective, vicious, corrupt, or deprived'; Reform Government and governing; reform of Elections; reformation" Not what it means- the meaning indicates that Govt. has to reform its style of functioning, eliminate corruption and provide for the deprived. Now, without understanding meaning of REFORM, why should all these persons shout in chorus, 'reform or FDI? FDI means = FAVOUR US & GET DOOMED INDIA.

Modernisation globalisation westernisation corporatisation and finally commercialisation of everything including education ,health care ,social relations are imported products which Manmohan singh,Chidambaram,Monteksingh Ahuliwalliia are selling in

Post a Comment
*
1000 characters left

All comments will be reactively moderated

Disclaimer: The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. Comments are automatically posted live; however, newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

Recent Activity

What's Hot?