When priests rule the temple roost

08th December 2012 11:22 PM

The last place I expected to get gypped was in a temple. The details are not important because I am a little fatalistic: maybe it was meant to be. This happened at one of the most prominent of Bhubaneswar’s 7,000 temples, the Lingaraj temple. Everybody I asked in Odisha has a negative impression of the pandas. A panda (religious servitor/priest) was hovering like a vulture even as our car was parking and he swooped down as we stepped out. A panda provides a guided tour of the temple premises. Woe betide anyone who thinks he can do without a panda. The ratio of panda to pilgrim is roughly one to one or stacked in favour of the panda—at least that seemed to be the case. It was taken for granted that I was a Hindu, of course, or else I would not have been allowed to step inside the temple premises. There have been instances of foreigners sneaking into Jagannath temple and being discovered later and manhandled before the temple was cleansed. Foreigners can view the deity from afar when it is taken out in the rath but cannot touch or climb the vehicle. Being married to a non-Hindu can be problematic: it is said that Mrs Indira Gandhi was disallowed entry to the Puri Jagannath temple as she had married a Parsi. Outside the walls of the Lingaraj temple, there is a special viewing platform erected from where those foreigners wishing to gaze upon the temple can do so. The day I went, at around ten in the morning, there was no one on that platform.

Pandas can be intimidating or hectoring and the experience can be discouraging. Renuka Chowdhury visited the temple in 2005 as tourism minister and had this to say of her half-an-hour long visit: “I am disappointed. I was terrified at Jagannath temple.” She was surprised at the degree of indiscipline and the state of the temple, which she found slippery. If there was discipline at Vaishno Devi and Tirupati, why not at Jagannath temple, she asked. The same year, the president of the Indian Association of Tour Operators, who had taken his family to the temple, called a press conference afterwards to reportedly declare that he would never again go to the temple “where attendants engaged in the worship of the Lord dare to outrage the modesty of mothers and sisters in the presence of family members”.

Before I was taken to see the main Puri temple deities up close, our guide priest cautioned strenuously, saying “there will be many who will ask from you, but do not give”. There have been instances of priests scuffling for money leading to fisticuffs and bloody nose. Once inside the throng of the temple, things can get chaotic. Once a panda pressed a couple of tulsi leaves into my hand, expecting money in return, and when I didn’t give, he raised his voice. My Oriya is not all that good so it was lost on me. To get a decent darshan, pandas ask for money. Some pandas claim there is a direct correlation between the money you give him and the benefits you get from the deity. One servitor even said that the money that I had offered the deity was so little as to be unworthy. When I attempted to take it back, he clasped it firmly, refusing to relinquish the unworthy currency note, glaring at me. It is all so crass and demeaning of a great temple.

Sudarshan@newindianexpress.com

A+ A A-

Comments(10)

while I do not bat for Pandas, the fact remains, they are not getting monthly salary,no bonus, no overtime, no leave travel concession, no airconditioned cabins to work, no chauffer driver office car, no 5 star parties, etc. they depend upon the largesse of the pilgrims. in the present running inflation, every one wants to make money. what is wrong in Pandas asking for more from the pilgrims. there is no compulsion in hinduism. you need not visit the temple again. it is the poverty that makes people to ask for more. i wonder, why such a fuss about poor priests

You seems to be justifying the acts of these Pandas Mr. Mohan though you are saying you are not. Who has compelled these Pandas to do the temple service if they are unable to make there ends meet by that. They can go and become manual labourers at the least if nothing else. Most of the Indian population live like that only. You said that " the fact remains, they are not getting monthly salary,no bonus, no overtime, no leave travel concession, no airconditioned cabins to work, no chauffer driver office car, no 5 star parties, etc. they depend upon the largesse of the pilgrims. in the present running inflation, every one wants to make money. what is wrong in Pandas asking for more from the pilgrims." As if every Indian is entitled for such things. Shall all the underprivileged people who are'nt getting all these things turn robbers like them ?

Prashantji, u have hit the nail on its head. If people from some elite communities do illegal activities it is okay .. that is the mind-set. Had people from some unprivileged community had done this, this would have come long back in the media tarnishing them. A wrong is a wrong. We are living under the Indian constitution not under the regressive law of Manu. When will these people learn.

Mr. Govindan tries to reverse truth, but what anyone knows from decades of public domain information is the exact opposite of what you say. It is the Pandas etc that are maligned, not the other kind. This article is itself an evidence. Anyway, this is all superficial argumentation - the real questions still stare at our face - what are the vocations that restore respectability of those groups that lost them in the recent centuries? How to provide occupations to those non-English educated but nevertheless skilled groups in different areas? Being a society that believes in preserving diversity instead of foisting a monolithic education or finance model, how should India's many sections be restored with respectable vocations?

But why not? Your question is "who asked the Pandas", but not "who got them to that state" - so a bad question. The tide of time brings many changes - Maratha warrior groups became pindaris and pillage groups when European rulers invalidated their professions. Many royal groups of north India became SC groups of today during Mughal rule. Compared to this the fall of Pandas is not very bad, but a fall nevertheless. In fact many places in south India, traditionally trained temple priests make less than a govt salaried watchman. What Mr. Mohan said is right, and that does not amount to justifying what the Pandas do today. It raises questions as to how Hindu shrines and organizations can regain their credibility, and their vocations revived in time instead of rendering them beggars and looters. The same holds with many groups, SC and ST whose livelihood was lost during the last few centuries. To restore their respectability you first need to understand the situation.

Agree. just a day back i was there in Puri. I refused Panda service and had a good darsan.Orissa templeware managed very badly.as is the state by the foriegn educated Naveen. Andhra temple priestsare very courteous but T.N is bad. In Kerala we have no special darsan ( money ).

In some of the other temples that the author has referenced, we can see this happening with the only exception that they dont force you to part away with money.... But i felt that Orissa & its people is probably the least behind money. On one of our visits to B'neswar, we gave the cab driver, who took us around for 2 days a 500 Rs note and to our shock he returned 300 Rs. And when we were going around near the Jagannath temple using a tuk-tuk, that guy charged 4 Re per head for 4 of us and this is almost 2 Kms distance that i am talking about...It was probably one of those bad days for Sudarshan.......

That temples are turned into places of anything but devotion with the tourism concept, and that someone who goes to a temple with devotion is bound to feel sad about how the temples have become, is not something difficult to notice. That is simply because Temples historically were never merely places where people go and pray - they were centers that sustained the local culture, local history and traditions, local vocations. When they did not have to depend on devotees and visitors, when temples had their proper sources of management, things were entirely different. Today these people depend on the "tourists" as they see them, and temples have become tourist spots with their own fancy-devotion business model. But question remains - how to undo the damage and restore the real value?

" it is said that Mrs Indira Gandhi was disallowed entry to the Puri Jagannath temple as she had married a Parsi. " Likewise Parsis dont allow Any Paesi into Paesi shrine if the Parsi is married to a hindu.Read about a case in Gujarat just this year.Entire city of Mecca is out of bounds to all nonuslims just FYI. I agree the Pandas must be resgulated and kept under short leash. Also non hindus must be allowed into ALL hindu mandirs, Iam a hindu by the way.

thank you for sharing an story about the incredible taxi and tuk tuk drivers. Yes there are great souls still around in India living a dharmic life, otherwise with those politicians and bureaucrats running the nation, it should have gone up in flames.

Post a Comment
*
1000 characters left

All comments will be reactively moderated

Disclaimer: The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. Comments are automatically posted live; however, newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

Recent Activity

What's Hot?