Bal Thackeray’s strength was his courage
By S Gurumurthy
24th November 2012 12:00 AM
To his followers he was god. To his detractors he was demon. To the liberals he was fascist. To the seculars he was communal. To the system he was challenge. To the media he was enigma. To politics he was toast. To the Hindus he was protector. To the Muslims he was question mark. Yet his personal physician was a Muslim just as the personal physicians of Jinnah were Hindus. This is Bal Thackeray 360 degrees.
An orator who could make his audience laugh and cry, Thackeray emerged as the most charismatic leader of Mumbai, later Maharashtra. He redefined cosmopolitan Bombay into Maharashtrian Mumbai and culturally won the city back to its traditions. Few dared to be on his wrong side. Everyone — Indira Gandhi or Karunanidhi — wanted to shake hands with him. He could still Bombay with his shrill call. He never contested an election, but could make anyone win or lose one. He never occupied any position, but installed and unseated chief ministers. He shared desk as a cartoonist in the Free Press Journal with great cartoonist R K Lakshman. He stormed into public life first as the protector of Maharashtrians against South Indians who were swarming Mumbai. Soon he found that Chatrapathi Shivaji as his icon did not match the narrow limits of his Marathi agenda. Result: He readily transformed Shiv Sena as a Hindu force and gained wider acceptability in national politics. None could really fathom the source of his power. However, what was the source of his power? His courage to court unpopularity was the essence of his power. All politicians are terrified of becoming unpopular. Bal Thackeray defied unpopularity, even revelled in it. This broadly sums Bal Thackeray. This was the Thackeray I knew from a distance; and now the Thackeray I experienced from near.
My first meetings with him were at the famous penthouse of Express Towers in Mumbai. In early 1989, he came to meet Ramnath Goenka. The issue was to form alliances among highly contradicting persons and parties ranging from the ultra-secular and Mandalite V P Singh at one end and the BJP and Shiv Sena with the Hindu and Ayodhya agenda at the other, to defeat the Congress. For V P Singh the Muslim vote in Uttar Pradesh was a must to defeat the Congress, something that did not concern Thackeray. V P Singh had been making critical remarks against communal Shiv Sena and other Hindu outfits to prove his secular credentials. This was the background of the meeting. Four persons — Goenka, Thackeray, Prabhash Joshi (Hindi editor) and myself — were present in the meeting.
Thackeray told Ramnath Goenka that he was for an alliance even with the devil he would not like to look at, to defeat Rajiv Gandhi. Goenka then asked me to explain the compulsions of V P Singh to keep criticising Thackeray to foster his secular image to the comfort of the Muslim voters in UP. I told him how V P Singh was already struggling to keep the Mandal and Muslim votes despite his inevitable alliance with the BJP and so he needed some Hindu figures to pass negative remarks and Thackeray’s name was necessarily one. Thackeray asked me how many more times V P Singh would criticise him. I replied “another three times”. Thackeray said “okay”, but added “fourth time, tell him, he cannot land in Mumbai”.
Then, Ramnath Goenka told him that, from the Indian Express side, I was helping the work of building an alliance against the Congress and would need all his support. Thackeray took my right hand, put his right hand in my right palm closed it with his left hand, and told me, “Guruswamy, I have put Shiv Sena in your hands. It is now your responsibility”. I was stunned. I corrected him on my name. The meeting was over. Thackeray left. My friend Perez Chandra, a free lance journalist and a man Goenka immensely liked, entered the room. He and me met Thackeray several times later. We discussed everything that happened. Ramnath Goenka told us that Thackeray’s strength was his courage to say what he believed in — right or wrong. Perez is the only surviving witness. PS: To Thackeray, I always remained ‘Guruswamy’. He could never get my name right.
comment@gurumurthy.net
Post a Comment
Recent Activity
- For team Rahul, it’s good politics that will yield rich dividends for poor Indians
- Incredible India! Cuppa at Rs 1,200 is Chiru’s idea of sustainable tourism
- Farmer gets wise, beats drought with micro-irrigation
- Translation to go hi-tech; C-DAC to launch ‘Translator’
- Hurdles galore as UPA walks road to Ballot 2014
- BJP's post-Karnataka gloom: Neither united nor untainted
- Hit by chit fund scam Mamata faces biggest challenge in 2 years
- Western Ghats: Gadgil’s missive to Kasturirangan opens fresh debate
- Siddaramaiah has his way with team
- Key relationships
- Man arrested for attempt to attack TV host Ranjini Haridas
- Car makers run into diesel dilemma
- Rs 8K-crore plan for upgrading ICVs of Army
- Kept on Congress fringe, says Mani Shankar Aiyer
- Hyderabad beat Kolkata, make semis; put RCB out
Comments(4)
Dear Mr Gurumurthy His strength was not what you refer as 'courage' ... but the 'brutal unquestioned and unconditional obedient violanece of his followers inculcated and practiced from 1966 [in 1970 have personally and helplessly witnessed the 'raw' violence [an old helpless old man was beaten to death in the first class compartment of local train between Vidya vihar and Ghatkopar by his followers] Also your remaining 'Guruswamy' was definitely not out of his incapacity to get your name right... but to show he can even ignore calling right the names of people around him. Yes his bodyguards were Tamilians.. when he was beating them around , his personal doctor reportedly a Mussalman [since he took care to categorise even them between those who migrated from Bangladesh/Pakistan etc] when he was putting them down in his speeches..... Are you by any chance aware how he grew and how much wealth thru 'protection funds' were taken during his initial years from every industry there?
Posted by ganapathyg at 11/24/2012 06:38 Reply to this Report abuse
Yes.Your observations are factually correct. I can add one information Mr. Thackeray would all along opposed Pakistan cricket team playing in India and his sainiks once vandalised Wankade stadium to prevent the Indo-Pak match .But he can host diner to Javed Miandad (his hatred towards India is well known and he is also the relative of Dawood Ibrahim,the destroyer of Bombay) no body can question that.
Posted by R VENKATESH at 11/24/2012 11:16 Reply to this Report abuse
I understand from your article the motivating force behind people like you to bring two extreme forces together was based on hatred nothing but hatred towards Congress,particularly Nehru family.By making this unholy alliances happen you have sustained congress rule and brought Sonia Gandhi to power.In 1977 to defeat congress all the political parties who are totally opposed each other were brought together and that experiment failed miserably.(Like SVD governments) The Congress came back with vengeance.In 1989 you wanted to throw out Rajiv Gandhi and brought B.J.P, Shivasena and V.P.Singh together.Again miserable failure.V.P.Singh has to dropped like a hot potato ( Later V.P.Singh said the accusation against Rajiv in Bofors was wrong) Finally you find fault with Sonia Gandhi's back room maneuvers but what is that you have done and is doing? It is really a pity in this so called democracy back room boys are powerful.
Posted by R VENKATESH at 11/24/2012 11:31 Reply to this Report abuse
Kudos to Gurumoorthy for his outspokenness in this era of Hindu-biting journalism , particularly by the English media. It is a truth that nobody questions (when he was alive and now after his death) Bal Thackeray s patriotism. I am a south Indian living in Mumbai for nearly 35 years and I know many south Indians, Sikhs, Gujaratis, Christians and even Muslims admire him for his courage of conviction. Just a few days before his death, according to Marathi newspapers, he fired former president Pratibha Patil (who had called on Thackeray) for not hanging terrorist Afzal Guru . Shiv Sena voted for Patil in the presendential election on the understanding that she will reject Guru's mercy petition. That was Thackerary's courage and patriotism.
Posted by Vaidyanathan at 11/26/2012 13:05 Reply to this Report abuse