Ethnic rights in Sri Lanka

23rd November 2012 12:00 AM

As a post-conflict society Sri Lanka has to engage in peace building and state reconstruction after years of war with the Tamil minority, who are now represented by the Tamil National Alliance (TNA). For years the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) engaged in a civil war for Tamil rights creating parallel structures to those of the state and supporting the cause of secession. In doing this, the LTTE also held its own people hostage, assassinating even those within the community who wanted to opt for peaceful means of struggle through non-violent and political ways. The Tamil National Alliance (TNA) that has emerged as one of the main parties representing the Tamil people after the 30 year war ended, is an organisation that suffered on account of both the obduracy of the Sri Lankan state as well as the LTTE. The Sri Lankan government should recognise this changed reality.

However, what has happened since the end of the war? The Sri Lankan government appointed the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) that met thousands of victims and came out with a report. The TNA rejected this report’s findings and recommendations because this report did not hold the government accountable and did not give justice or even a full account of the war crimes that the international community, Press and United Nations’ agencies showed had occurred. At the same time, while the LLRC has strong shortcomings, it makes some recommendations that can initiate a process with which the Tamil leaders can start work, and then move ahead negotiating their demands systematically.

The Sri Lankan government held elections after the war, including in the north and east areas that were earlier not under Colombo’s control, to show that a period of normalcy had been initiated. In this election the TNA won significantly. Their main demand is the creation of a type of federal Sri Lanka where the Tamils can have autonomy. They want a merger of the north and east areas where Tamils live. They talk of the Thirteenth Amendment, which was backed by India years back that will make a kind of federal arrangement possible. The Sri Lankan government, however, does not appear to consider any of their demands seriously.

The Tamils also want that the hundred thousand Tamils displaced by the war should be returned to their homes and rehabilitated with their livelihood and dignity. This process has been painfully slow and has only added to the grief of the minority community. Women have been very seriously affected by the conflict. Gendered crimes were rampant. They were symbols of Tamil honour and thus abused. Many participated in the war as suicide bombers and guerilla outfits and became victims and martyrs. They bore the burden of looking after their families and community. They need special attention.

Things are far from normal in Sri Lanka. This stems first from the triumphalism, majoritarianism, militarisation and stereotyping in the mindset of the Sri Lankan regime in power as well as in all structures and institutions. President Mahinda Rajapakse’s regime is not willing to address the root cause of the Tamil minority problem. They frequently refer to the TNA as holding on to the LTTE positions. This is untrue. The Tamils have given up the demand for a separate state and will settle for a federal arrangement.

At the same time, the TNA and other Tamils must also recognise the Tamil Muslims, who were forced to migrate out of Tamil areas by the LTTE during their hold on the area. They must not accede to the pressure of the Tamil diaspora and their long distance and surrogate extra nationalism. If the TNA wants a plural, secular and federal Sri Lanka they also must in turn recognise minority rights and make adequate social, political and economic space for their own minorities and dissenters.

Interestingly, President Rajapaksa has appealed to the influential forces in India that can sway Tamil opinion, including the Indian media. He knows India can play a major role. At the same time, in Tamil Nadu, emotions remain high and sensitive on the Tamil ethnic cause in Sri Lanka. All political parties and Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa have been repeatedly asking the Indian government to put pressure on the Sri Lankan government. Recently Jayalalithaa wrote a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh objecting to India training Sri Lankan Army personnel. She continuously takes up this cause as it is a major political issue.

India in its turn is walking on a razor’s edge. On the one hand they need to make sure the Tamil sentiment is not hurt. They would like to see a Sri Lanka that can only be stable if it accepts a multi-ethnic, federal structure but also respects minority and human rights. On the other hand India cannot intervene in local politics beyond a point because it can be considered as hegemonic and the Sri Lankan regime will turn to China and could even give them a military base. At the same time China can never replace India in Sri Lankan geopolitics.

So in these circumstances India has to tread carefully where its priority should be to keep putting sustained yet subtle pressure that Sri Lanka deliver on the issue of ethnic rights. It also has to indicate to the Sri Lankan Tamil parties, like the TNA, that they too must ensure the rights of all communities. The only way for a just solution to Sri Lanka would be a step-by-step federal, right-based restructuring within a time frame acceptable by all parties. This would include de-militarisation and ensuring women’s rights, rehabilitation and participation. Liberals and ethnic minorities of Sri Lanka believe India has a positive role in this. India should try and fulfil this.

Anuradha Mitra Chenoy is professor at the School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University.

E-mail: chenoy@gmail.com

A+ A A-

Comments(10)

So what is the root cause of the "Tamil Problem", I think you don't have a clue. It was never about devolution of power. It was about language, jobs and education but not about regional autonomy.

Gujarat is the Homeland of Gujaratis Punjab is the Homeland of Punjabis Kerala is the Home land of Keralites Bihar is the Homeland of Biharis AND... TamilNadu (Tamil translated into English = "Tamil State") is the Homeland of Tamils AND Sinha ("Sinha" as it was known in ancient Indian literature/scripts or modern day Sri Lanka) is the Homeland of Sinhalas! If anyone other than the indigenous population (as shown in this list of example) in any of these examples wants to have his/her own "Homeland" in another - well, that's where we are bound to have problem! Would Punjabis in Punjab entertain an idea of the Gujaratis there agitating for a separate state? Somehow I think NOT! Amen/Amin!

Simon Gafoor. you can assume any name but it won't help you hide your racist Sinhala face. The Sinhala Chronicles Mahavamsa clearly says, the Tamils were in Sri Lanka from the dawn of history, not just citizens but as powerful Rulers too. The Naga Prince Duttu Gemunu had to fight with not one but thirty-two Tamil chieftains in Anuradhapuram Principality alone to reach the Tamil King Elara's palace. If there were thirty-two Tamil chieftains and a Tamil king ruling the Anuradhapura kingdom, the Anuradhpuram kingdom must have had a huge Tamil population also. Therefore, we can safely say it was a Tamil city at that time. Without a large Tamil population, there is no need for thirty-two Tamil chieftains. Do you agree? So, Mahavamsa says we Tamils are here from the dawn of the history of Sri Lanka but you are saying we are not and we can't claim homeland in Sri Lanka. Do you think Monk Mahanama was drunk when he wrote the Mahavamsa or you are drunk now?

The fact is the Tamils are the indigenous people of Sri Lanka .What infuriates us the most is, the present day Sinhalese, the remnants of Portuguese’s hanky - panky in Sri Lanka have the nerve to tell us, the Eelam Tamils, the descendants of Jaffna kingdom who have roots in Sri Lanka from the dawn of history, that we can't claim homeland in Sri Lanka. "According tothe Sinhala Academic Kumari Jayawardena, the Portuguese rulers encouraged their men to marry local females, so that many who today bear PORTUGUESE NAMES are partly of Portuguese descent. What those facts mean is that most of the TAMILS ARE MORE INDEGIGENOUS to the Sri Lankan soil, have a MORE AUTHENTIC ORGANIC CONNECTION with it, than a substantial proportion of the Sinhalese."

Tamils were part of "Sinhale" or "Heladiva" (in sinhala) / Eelam (in tamil) or Shree Lanka (today, for both) from ancient times. No one is denying that. They were more concentrated in pockets of North while the Sinhalas were in all the rest of the country. There is evidence that tamil kings ruled Sri Lanka and Sinhala kings married princesses from South India etc, but race was never an issue UNTIL one day when Whites invaded the country, brought more tamils from Tamilnadu into the country to "dialute" the power of the Sinhala natives, (who were too proud to live under white masters rule, while Tamils worshipped the whites, why on earth they forgot all the language issues when they were ordered to speak in English as official language?) IN ORDER to create a rift between the 2 communities. (divide and rule)... Sri Lanka is MULTI-ETHNIC today. Where there were traditionally Sinhalas, there are Tamils (Colombo - 60% speak tamil, Hill counry is full of tamils). So this "homeland" argumant

(sorry 4 interruption). Homeland argument is no fair and not just today when "Sinhala homeland" is full of tamils their can not be a "Tamil homeland" without the Sinhalas. This will never be accepted by sri lankans therefore it will only lead to useless conflict. Where there's unjust demands, there will be war. Tamils must understand this they have suffered most and learn the lesson that their racist TNA will only take them back to hell they were.

The entire article does not flow to cover any basic argument. The TNA announced in 2002 that the sole representative of the Tamil people was the LTTE. TNA stands guilty of pro-LTTE agendas. LTTE killed Tamils and has no real credibility to call itself functioning on behalf of Tamils - it only usurped the idea to enable LTTE and its leadership to prevail enslaving the rest of the Tamils... the greater plan is to have a Tamil state - that Tamil state should be in Tamil Nadu... Sri Lanka is simply a model exercise to lay the foundation for the greater plan... We think it time Indias' Government takes serious steps to stop Tamil Nadu's separatism...

TNA was actually relieved at the end of Prabhakaran after which they can achieve thier cunning poilitical goals i.e. spread ethnic hatred for thier survival as only representatives of tamil communinty. Blood of sril ankans i.e. tamil. sinhala and muslim are on their hands simillar to that of LTTE

here we go again..another pseudo analyses without any substance...why tamils need autonomy ans special privileges, what so special about them that the non on other people deserve such treatment..what r these special problems that tamil only face and that none of the sinhalese,muslims and indian tamils are not faacing..and how creating a ghetto with special privileges to tamil will solve this giving the fact that vast majority of tamils living out side this proposed ghetto ..if the current system is faulty, the it should be fixed such than every body will benefit and not such that only a racist ideology of the one section will resolved...and certainly creating small ghettos with the same faulty system so that few tamils can act like a majority will not solve most of the peoples aspirations ...only solution is tamils to get rid of this tribal mentality started since 1920 by their racist forefathers like chlevanayagam and ponnambalam..learn to participate in governance in the center.

Tamils do not need special treatment but equal treatment. It is convenient that you seem to forget that tamils wanted to live in a united Sri lanka enshrined within the solsbury constitution that respected the rights of minority religion until 1956 with the enforcement of the Sinhala only act. It is amazing how you do not consider the Sinhala only act as racist. This led to the expulsion of tamils from government jobs. The standardisation of education that gave special privileged to sinhala students to score less than tamils and enter university. Why did the sinhalese need such privileges and why is it that tamils cannot get have the same treatment. Why is it that during 1948-1977 Sri lankan government carried out anti-tamil progroms and not anti-Sinhala. Why do tamils get such special treatment. Can you explain the non-racist reason for burning Jaffna Library?

Post a Comment
*
1000 characters left

All comments will be reactively moderated

Disclaimer: The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. Comments are automatically posted live; however, newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

Recent Activity

What's Hot?