SC refuses to hear plea by Sahara group companies
By IANS - NEW DELHI
25th February 2013 06:27 PM
-
The apex court had directed the Sahara Group companies to submit to SEBI within 15 days all the documents related to collection of money from investors, including application forms. (File/PTI)
In a set back to Sahara groups's two real estate companies, the Supreme Court Monday declined to entertain their application seeking extension of time to deposit investors' money to market regulator Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI).
"You have not complied with it (the court order) and have
no business to come here again," the apex court bench headed by Chief Justice Altamas Kabir said, recalling its earlier order.
The two Sahara group companies -- Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd. (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Ltd. (SHICL) -- were directed by the court to return Rs.17,400 crore of investors' money with
15 percent interest.
The court by its Dec 5 order had directed SEBI to accept a deposit of Rs.5,000 crore by the companies. It had further directed the companies to pay Rs.10,000 crore in January 2013 and the balance amount in the first week of February.
The apex court had also directed the Sahara Group companies to submit to SEBI within 15 days all the documents related to collection of money from investors, including application forms.
Appearing for the companies, senior counsel Ram Jethmalani sought more time to comply with
the order. The chief justice, however, told him that the petitioner companies had earlier made the same plea before another bench of the court which was declined.
Declining to entertain the Sahara real estate companies' application, the court said: "We passed the order to make it possible to pay the investors' money, but you failed to comply with it."
At the outset of the hearing, the president of the Supreme Court Bar Association and senior counsel M.N. Krishnamani told the court that it should not hear the application as another bench of the court was dealing with the matter.
Krishnamani said: "This (apex) court has got certain healthy traditions and conventions under which when an order is passed by a bench, another bench will not interfere with it."
Post a Comment
Recent Activity
- Japan support sought for Vision 2023
- Rahul aide to pick Nellore MP candidate
- Kerala: PSC guidelines put candidates in a fix
- Dead son's education loan: Bank seeks its pound of flesh
- With Advani visit, Modi begins charm offensive
- Social media goes martial over High Court's marital ruling
- Slum removal scheme tweaked to make it more effective
- Ready to tune in the lord, catch him up on Twitter
- Thousands missing near Kedarnath shrine
- Indian Coast Guards help rescue 26 crew from shipwreck near Yemen
- Tata Motors unveils 8 upgraded models of passenger vehicles
- Flaws in Koodankulam plant
- Army Major captures 'UFO' in Kerala
- Prices of 348 drugs to come down drastically from May 15
- Callgate: Doctors were prime target for Biju, Saritha Nair
- Learnt to embrace simplicity from SRK: Puvisha
Comments(8)
Sahara ke sath beimani
Posted by Ravi kishan at 02/25/2013 20:57 Reply to this Report abuse
Sahara is talking non sense. They have already advertised in the newspaper that majority of bonds are redeemed and only Rs 2600 crores are yet to be redeemed for which they have deposited Rs 500 crores with SEBI. WHY ARE THEY ASKING FOR TIME EXTENSION???-Food for thought-what is the real intention of SAHARA
Posted by Jitendra Shaw at 02/26/2013 11:00 Reply to this Report abuse
Sahara has already redeemed significant number of OFCD Holders. Thus any further payments to SEBI would amount to double payment. Supreme Court would hear the review petition of Sahara group and come up with fair decision
Posted by ramesh at 03/06/2013 17:37 Reply to this Report abuse
I don’t think the freezing is done for right coz the actions taken by Sebi are based on "old facts" and the orders for attaching assets of individuals are incorrect on part of the market regulator
Posted by Rajesh at 03/06/2013 17:49 Reply to this Report abuse
One should also note that not only Sahara has paid to Sebi enough amounts which is much higher than outstanding liabilities of two companies, the fact also remains in the whole affair Sahara is genuinely concerned for investors.
Posted by sandeep at 03/06/2013 17:59 Reply to this Report abuse