Rahul Gandhi's speech: Poignant or 'lacking in content'?
By IANS - NEW DELHI
22nd January 2013 09:56 AM
-
PTI
Rahul Gandhi in his first speech as Congress vice president touched an emotional chord among many with references to his mother, party chief Sonia Gandhi, and his father and grandmother, and his frank critique of the party's functioning and of the ills of the "system", but many others wonder if there was any real substance in what he spoke.
The 1,200 strong gathering of Congress leaders and activists at the Birla Auditorium in Jaipur erupted in hurrahs and some leaders were seen wiping away tears after Rahul Gandhi's speech.
"I think his speech was not as a politician..., His references to how his mother cried etc. were meant to gain sympathy... But I did not find much substance in his speech," Gagan Sharma, a professional in his 30s, told IANS.
"The vision he has tried to show, that we have to bring change. Where was he when people were holding massive protests against corruption when Anna Hazare was there in New Delhi, and when there were tens of thousands protesting against the gang-rape?... He never once came out and addressed the people," Sharma noted.
In an emotional speech in Jaipur, Rahul Gandhi said: "The Congress party is my life. The people of India are now my life. And I will fight for the people of India and for this party."
"As a boy I loved to play badminton because it gave me balance in a complicated world. I was taught by two policemen who protected my grandmother and were my friends. They killed my grandmother and took way the balance...In the evening I saw my father address the nation. He was terrified of what lay ahead of him. But I saw a glimmer of hope. That hope has brought India where it is today."
Referring to his mother speaking to him after he was named vice president, Rahul Gandhi said: "Last night my mother came to my room and she sat and cried. She cried because she understands the power that so many people seek is actually a poison. She can see it, what it does to people around and to the people they love."
Usha Kaushal, a homemaker, was very impressed by Rahul's speech.
"I was really moved and touched when I heard his speech.. It was very poignant, especially what he said about power being poison... It is correct, a lot of young people who want to join politics realise it, they are scared because power corrupts. We want leaders who have their heart in the right place and want to do something for the country," she added.
Simi Singh, a college student, said she was not very impressed by the 42-year-old leader's speech.
"In the eight years since he joined politics, and despite belonging to a political family, he was speaking in a way that no one has done earlier.. Other leaders have always spoken progressive things, but he did not say anything progressive, or what initiatives the Congress party-led government is planning to take for welfare of the people. The aam public is not interested in such speeches."
However, she added: "I like the way he goes to people's homes and tries to understand their problems, but he should do something more concrete."
At the Delhi Metro and at roadside tea shops, Rahul Gandhi's speech was the topic of hot discussion among many.
"Why is Rahul Gandhi now talking about (misuse of) red lights? If he had wanted, he could have ensured that red (beacon) lights are not misused and then spoken about it," said a passenger on a Metro train that was going from Noida to Dwarka.
Another passenger quipped that Rahul Gandhi has all along been reluctant to take over charge of the party.
"Why is the Congress forcing a person who seems reluctant to become its leader? They should instead go for someone who is keen to become the leader," he added.
But many confessed that for the first time they heard Rahul Gandhi make such a passionate speech that made them listen to him.
"He may be reluctant in taking the leadership of the Congress party. But he should realise that if he wants he can bring positive changes in this country. He has the entire machinery backing him. He should take a call soon and not leave everyone guessing," said Ram Sharan Yadav, who works in a private company.
Post a Comment
Recent Activity
- India's bleeding insurgencies: Lessons from Latin America
- Western Ghat report has imperialist mindset: Ecologist
- Lot more to India-China ties than border stand-off: Experts
- Major industrial conglomerates making a beeline for Haryana
- Man kidnapped 23 years ago finds kin thanks to Google Maps
- Bangalore's techies start 'brand tattoos' craze
- Indian circuses struggle to adapt after court bans
- Want hassle-free tatkal ticket? Personally visit special counters
- Rs 8K-crore plan for upgrading ICVs of Army
- Man arrested for attempt to attack TV host Ranjini Haridas
- Kalabhavan Mani missing after assaulting forest staff
- Sreesanth, 2 other players 'confess'; more players under scanner
- Tamil Brahmi script dating to 500 BC found near Erode
- Meghalaya's CMJ University faces probe after awarding suspicious PhDs
- Shift me from ‘Anda’ cell, pleads Sanjay Dutt
- The toxic truth about ripe mangoes
Comments(8)
He is not merely good for nothing, he is positively harmful for the interests of this nation - because he has no clue what constitutes this country, this civilization. Like today's media and congress, this directionless brat will drive the country more directionless.
Posted by Kumaran at 01/22/2013 10:59 Reply to this Report abuse
First of all, whether the speech itself was his own or a prepared one by others? His party people will do anything to project him and they think their mission is to put him in Prime minister's chair . Party has elected him as V.P AND MEDIA seems to treat him as FUTURE P.M !
Posted by rajaram at 01/22/2013 16:56 Reply to this Report abuse
A few questions.What Rahul Gandhi ultimately wants to become? Is he not aspiring to become the Prime Minister? Is he not after power? Is he like Jayparkash Narayan?
Posted by Patriot at 01/23/2013 08:02 Reply to this Report abuse
The most serious weakness of democracy is that anyone can become the ruler.Raghul should see that he doesn't confirm this.Already his mother is clouded by the accusation that she hesitates to relinquish her Italian citizenship,casting doubts on her patriotism.Raghul should not be under any such confines.Politics is not a family business or profession. The involvement of 1.25 billion lives should constantly be in his mind. His father was 41 when he was made P.M.Hence,age is no handicap in his case.Sincerity, is what counts.A while ago,there was a comment.Raghul Gandhi would execute Mahatma Gandhi's wish--to wind up Congress!He should try to make the commentators eat their words.Or, disappear from the scene right now-to save the honour of his family or more so -of this great nation.
Posted by KALLAN KRISHNARAJ at 01/23/2013 13:30 Reply to this Report abuse
I don't think it's a weakness of democracy at all. Yes, the democracy as practiced in India has these weakness. If India practiced the presidential system the "prime minister" or shall we call the "president", would be chosen by the people. People like Rahul Gandhi, won't even stand a chance in that election, because there are no safe constituencies. Also, the elected MP's would have only power to legislate. The executive powers would be in the hands of President + an educated and competent executive staff. This means idiots like Lalu and people of his ilk won't have a shot at the power that comes through those positions. This also is the only way out of dynastic politics - this system works and it's succesful in many countries including US, would work beautifully for India too.
Posted by Guest at 01/23/2013 21:26 Reply to this Report abuse
The pre-requisites for a political leader are a combination of as many of the following attributes: Oratory, education, shrewdness, genuine-ness, ability to carry a team, ruthlessness, visionary, take up challenges head-on,... and some more that others may be able to contribute. The only attribute that Mr. R. Gandhi seems to display is foolishness - not listed above. Maybe he will re-write global history on leadership qualities, by putting India (and Indians) in further trouble. Did he ever prove his being an Indian, by formally denouncing his Italian citizenship? This is a constitutional issue and not one to be taken lightly.
Posted by Pappu Dikra at 01/24/2013 08:56 Reply to this Report abuse