Strictly implement the ban on tinted glasses
By The New Indian Express
03rd August 2012 11:56 PM
Like the red and green beacons on cars announcing the special status of the travellers and ensuring a speedy passage while the others are held up in traffic jams, tinted car windows are intended to distinguish those inside the vehicle from the ordinary mortals outside. They also carry the suggestion that the rich and famous inside do not want to be bothered by the prying eyes of inquisitive passers-by travelling on foot or in other vehicles. Instead, the VIPs would like to remain immersed in their own thoughts or in conversation or going through a file.
However, such an emphasis on exclusiveness carries a danger. For one, the tinted glasses can hide a terrorist or a crook escaping from or going to a scene of crime. For another, they can enable the occupants to get away after an accident if the police are remiss in noting the vehicle’s registration number. It is for reasons such as these that the Supreme Court has long decreed that the tinted glasses must be done away with because their purpose is not to keep out the sun’s glare but to massage the vanity of the vehicle owners.
Yet, the continuing refusal to abide by the judicial diktat is an indication of how influential are the owners. It is obvious that the police either lack the gumption to tell them to dispense with the tinted glasses or are shooed away with a frown or a bribe if they do. It is time, though, that the Supreme Court takes a firmer view of this persistent dereliction of duty by the law-enforcing agencies and hold them guilty of the contempt of court if the high and mighty are allowed to flaunt their defiance. Once the policemen show at least one VIP that no one is above the law by removing the tinted glasses along with imposing a hefty fine, the others are bound to fall in line for, like all bullies, they are aware of the grave consequences of crossing the line.
Post a Comment
Recent Activity
- You are aiming high, but beware of marketers selling you as an FMCG
- With Advani visit, Modi begins charm offensive
- Social media goes martial over High Court's marital ruling
- Slum removal scheme tweaked to make it more effective
- Ready to tune in the lord, catch him up on Twitter
- 95 per cent stolen goods not recovered in Kerala, says NCRB
- Karnataka MLAs were frugal in their poll spending
- Now talcum powder linked to ovarian cancer
- Indian Coast Guards help rescue 26 crew from shipwreck near Yemen
- Thousands missing near Kedarnath shrine
- Army Major captures 'UFO' in Kerala
- Learnt to embrace simplicity from SRK: Puvisha
- Flaws in Koodankulam plant
- Callgate: Doctors were prime target for Biju, Saritha Nair
- Prices of 348 drugs to come down drastically from May 15
- Congress to vote in Nitish government's favour today
Comments(2)
This is probably the silliest of all premises I have read - with an even more sillier premise. The author is converting a simple issue of protection against sun and heat into a class issue. No sir, we are not practicing snobbery against lesser mortals - unlike you, who is snobbery personified. We are just trying to adjust to a geographical feature - sub-tropical heat - and make our own lives a bit easier to deal with. And, the arguments are specious. The police says "no darkening stickers on the windows, but tinted glass is OK". This is simply a way for tinted glass makers to make money at the owners' cost. The author is super-naive, or super-hypocritical. k
Posted by Karthi Sivaraman at 08/06/2012 11:01 Reply to this Report abuse
May I respectfully, and sincerely ask if these four (Chief Justice SH Kapadia, AK Patnaik, Swatanter Kumar, Avisekh Goenka) were out of their legal minds???? More importantly, do these eminent guys travel in a car without tinted film stuck on the windows sweating in this October sun??? or are they comfortably seated in their air-conditioned offices?
Posted by Saurabh Karandikar at 10/18/2012 15:15 Reply to this Report abuse