Steve Finn denied wicket by dead ball decision
By Fred Atkins / Associated Press - LEEDS, England
03rd August 2012 10:10 AM
The International Cricket Council and the Marylebone Cricket Club have stepped into a row over a dead ball dismissal by Steven Finn on day one of the second test at Headingley between England and South Africa on Thursday.
The England quick bowler was controversially denied the wicket of South Africa captain Graeme Smith in the 12th over of the morning session when the batsman edged Finn to England captain Andrew Strauss at first slip.
In a joint statement, the ICC and the MCC — the guardians of the laws of the game — confirmed umpire Steve Davis had ruled the ball was dead because Finn had dislodged the bails in his bowling follow through.
"Jeff Crowe, ICC Match Referee, (said) that Finn had broken the wicket at least three times prior to this specific incident," the statement said. "Both batsmen complained that it was a distraction and Finn was told to move over. The umpires decided that if it happened again they would call dead ball. It did and so Davis called it under 23.4(b)(vi)."
England bowler James Anderson disputed this. "That's not Finny's take on it," he said. "He was told to be careful because it was distracting the batsmen, but at no stage was he told it would be a dead ball."
Anderson claimed the batsmen, Smith and Alviro Petersen, had been "in the umpires' ears."
"It's strange it's not been complained about before because he's done it hundreds of times," Anderson said. "It's a frustrating one for us because we didn't get any warning he was going to do it, so we were a bit perplexed by that. You'd think it'd be more distracting for the bowler than the batsman to be honest."
Strauss had an animated discussion with umpire Davis after the decision, but the law in question says: "An umpire shall call and signal dead ball when the striker is distracted by any noise or movement while receiving."
South Africa batsman AB de Villiers backed the call.
"It's part of the rules and I thought the umpires handled it really well," he said. "He stayed consistent after he made that first call and that's all any cricketer can want. Unfortunately the wicket was the first one he called which made it interesting, but he stuck to his guns."
Smith clearly wasn't distracted when Finn collided with the stumps for a fifth time in the 20th over because he pulled the ball to the deep midwicket fence, only for Davis to again call dead ball and negate the boundary.
Davis then denied Smith a second boundary when Finn once again brushed the stumps in the first over after lunch.
"A precedent may have been set but it remains to be seen whether dead ball will be called on each occasion that this happens for the remainder of the match," the statement added. "Unlike some other laws, there is no specified warning procedure for this situation. MCC's Laws sub-committee will discuss the matter at its next meeting and will work closely with ICC on issuing guidance to umpires."
- For team Rahul, it’s good politics that will yield rich dividends for poor Indians
- Four years of UPA-II
- Nine years as PM: What will be Manmohan Singh's legacy?
- Maharashtra’s aid to digitise rare manuscripts in Thanjavur
- 'Climate change may spell disaster for coastal economy'
- Lanka’s woman Thavil players fading away
- Pakistan's answer to electricity shortages: Don't wear socks
- All dead, no vultures fly in Andhra now!
- BSNL Ernakulam posts Rs 390-crore turnover
- Incredible India! Cuppa at Rs 1,200 is Chiru’s idea of sustainable tourism
- Chennai Super Kings beat Mumbai Indians, reach IPL finals
- Suriya storms ahead of Vijay, Ajith online
- CM can go his way: Ramesh Chennithala
- Yasin Malik’s support for Sri Lanka Tamils a sham
- Meghalaya's CMJ University faces probe after awarding suspicious PhDs
- Chandy aborted Chennithala’s Cabinet berth: NSS