Chidambaram pitches for PM-led Investment Board to speed up projects
By PTI - NEW DELHI
15th September 2012 03:25 PM
-
Chidambaram regretted that under the present dispensation, "a truly ‘final’ decision (on projects) does not emerge for many years". PTI File Photo
Concerned over delay in implementation of projects, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today suggested setting of a National Investment Board (NIB) under Prime Minister to accord speedy clearances to mega proposals.
"The NIB's authority should extend to proposals/projects where the investment is above a certain threshold, say, Rs 1,000 crore. Once the final decision is taken by the NIB, no other Ministry or Department or Authority should be able to interfere with that decision or delay its implementation," he said during his intervention at the meeting of the full Planning Commission.
Chidambaram regretted that under the present dispensation, "a truly `final' decision (on projects) does not emerge for many years".
He said outlays in the 11th Five Plan felt short of targets mainly because of failure to achieve physical targets.
Giving illustrations, the Minister pointed out that addition in power generation capacity during the Plan period was 55,000 MW as against the target of 78,700 MW. Similar shortfalls were witnessed in other key sectors like coal, crude oil, gas and railways.
In order to overcome these problems, Chidambaram said: "I would ... urge that we seriously consider the need to set up a mechanism at the Cabinet level to take final decisions on major investment proposals, especially in the infrastructure sector.
"The authority to take the final decision/decisions should be vested in a NIB to be chaired by the Prime Minister and the Allocation of Business Rules should be amended to create such a mechanism", he added.
At present, the Business Rules allocate the authority to take the final decision to one or more ministries.
The outcomes, Chidambaram said, "must be measured not only in terms of achieving the financial outlays but also achieving the physical targets. The main reason why actual growth rate in each Plan period was less than the targeted growth rate was the failure to achieve physical targets".
Referring to the 8.2 per cent growth target in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17), he said, it was "realistic" given the fact the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew by 7.6 per cent in the 10th Plan and 7.9 per cent in the 11th Plan.
The Minister, however, described the 12th Plan's proposal to reduce subsidy from 1.9 per cent of GDP in the budget estimates of 2012-13 to 1.2 per cent in 2016-17 as "over-optimistic".
According to the Minister, "the estimated major subsidies in 2012-13 would be around 2.4 per cent of GDP, and a sharp fall as assumed in the Plan may be over-optimistic. Direct cash transfer of subsidies in food, fertilisers and petroleum will help in this reduction.
"I would urge that by the end of the 12th Plan, these three major subsidies be rolled out across the country through direct cash transfers to the beneficiaries. Pilot projects are already under implementation for LPG and kerosene and it is our intention to extend the direct transfer mechanism to the UTs in the first phase," he added.
On the investment side, the Minister said, the gross budgetary support (GBS) during the entire 12th Plan period has been estimated at Rs 35.68 lakh crore which works out to 5.23 per cent of GDP over the five-year period.
The GBS realised over the 11th Plan period was only 4.69 per cent of GDP, he said, adding "the assumptions of tax to GDP ratio seem to be highly optimistic".
Post a Comment
Recent Activity
- For team Rahul, it’s good politics that will yield rich dividends for poor Indians
- Incredible India! Cuppa at Rs 1,200 is Chiru’s idea of sustainable tourism
- Farmer gets wise, beats drought with micro-irrigation
- Translation to go hi-tech; C-DAC to launch ‘Translator’
- Hurdles galore as UPA walks road to Ballot 2014
- BJP's post-Karnataka gloom: Neither united nor untainted
- Hit by chit fund scam Mamata faces biggest challenge in 2 years
- Western Ghats: Gadgil’s missive to Kasturirangan opens fresh debate
- Siddaramaiah has his way with team
- Key relationships
- Man arrested for attempt to attack TV host Ranjini Haridas
- Rs 8K-crore plan for upgrading ICVs of Army
- Car makers run into diesel dilemma
- Kept on Congress fringe, says Mani Shankar Aiyer
- Hyderabad beat Kolkata, make semis; put RCB out
Comments(2)
PC’s suggestion for a National Investment Board raises several baisc issues. It will be I)under the PM –already an overburdened one- (ii)for faster implementation of infra projects which are “shockingly stated to have been held up for want of truly final decisions”.Shorn of verbiage, it looks as if the tenets of governance of cabinet form of government has been turned upside down by this govt.in the last 8 years. We are further told that currently a panel on infra headed by the PM which set targets for the 11th Plan is ‘serviced’ by the Planning Commission. What follows should shock you even further. We are told that “no minister is in charge” and this is the reason why a “truly final decision does not emerge for many years”. And his recommendation is for a National Investment Board, a new powerful political and physical animal that may prowl in future in the capital horizon. And finally we are told that once the final decision is taken by the National Investment Board no other mini
Posted by s subramanyan at 09/16/2012 11:50 Reply to this Report abuse
no other ministry or department or authority should be able to interfere with that decision or delay implementation”. Reading all these not only make your head tizzy but also show that something has gone terribly wrong with our parliamentatry democracy with a cabinet and council of ministers aidede by a plethora of GoMs and EGoMs. Confounded citizens may legitiamately ask what are the ministers and civil servants for? For long we were worried about policy paralysis and now we are happily seeing a flood of deicisons and along with that a disturbing disclosure of how the decision making apparatus at the political and executive level is functioning. Will some opposition leaders or editorial writers examine all these and comment as the next parliament sesssion is weeks away?
Posted by s subramanyan at 09/16/2012 11:51 Reply to this Report abuse